Clearly, the first prediction about the food
was completely wrong. It's now 2012 and I've been overeating with
abandon right through the deadline Kerry stated.
As for the world running out of air, I'm going to bet that prediction will prove as accurate as the food prediction.
My
question is -- why repeat such obviously asinine testimony such as
this? All it does is hurt your credibility, makes you look like
wingnuts, and actually sabotages everything else you have to say because
the casual, uninformed viewer sits back and thinks, "Well, everything
else they're talking about is probably just as loopy as the food and air
predictions."
For people who present
themselves as "researchers" who are digging for the truth, where's the
research? Actually, where's the educated skepticism?
Art
Bell torpedoed himself in much the same way. He explored many
interesting topics on his show, had many interesting guests, but the
fact that he believed and gave credence to some of the most laughable
and easily disproven theories hurt him -- not the least of which was his
ridiculously serious introduction to the "screams from hell" as recorded from a deep hole in Siberia.
Really? Hell is in the center of the earth? The Russians dug a 9 km
hole and then went and found a microphone with a 9 km cord, lowered it
into the center of the earth without it melting, and were able to record
these sounds, which everyone instantly deduces are the screams of hell?
Really? That's school-yard apocryphal-tale-telling, not anything
approaching responsible research.
In a time
when secret operations need exposure. In a time when so many
conspiracies are active, and are damaging our democracy and our planet.
In a time when we could be using the Internet to disseminate
actual true information about these conspiracies, why in the world would
you torpedo your interview with Dr. Greer by sharing such an
outlandishly foolish prediction as the world running out of food in 10
months and running out of air in 4 years?
Why would you negate everything else you've done with statement such as this?
Responsible
researchers should eshew such statements and people who put forth such
ideas without voluminous evidence. The emphasis should be on the
evidence not the theories. The Internet is chockful of whacky theories.
I can get my fill on there all day. I want evidence.
Before I'm viewed as merely a crank raining on your parade, I
wanted to share a quick anecdote about how misinformation sinks the
whole ship.
When I was a kid, I was home sick one day in November 1983 and was watching Donahue
or one of those talk shows. They were discussing the assassination of
President John F. Kennedy. At that time in my life, all I knew was that
Lee Harvey Oswald killed him, and that was that. Obviously, I know
better now.
So, with that scant knowledge, I
watched a panel of researchers, which I believe included Mark Lane and
Robert Groden, both of whose work I have come to respect.
Among
the panel was one man who said, "If you watch the Zapruder film
closely, you'll see the Secret Service driver of the limousine turn
around and fire the fatal shot at JFK."
Even as
a child, I thought this was ridiculous and I've always remembered that
statement and the effect it had on the studio audience: After that man
put forth his ridiculous theory, the rest of the panel was painted with
the same brush by the audience. Everyone on the panel was taken down
with the ship, as it were. Suddenly, everyone's theories seemed silly.
No doubt, the man who put forth the limo-driver-as-assassin idea was a
misinformation agent whose job was to do precisely that -- torpedo the
entire panel. Mission accomplished, at least on that day.
And
so, I find similarly silly, ridiculous, easily disproven theories have
the same effect on conversations. Pardon the indelicate image, but such
theories are like a turd in the swimming pool -- they contaminate
everything within their reach.
So, ideas that we're going to run out of food in 10 months and run out of air in 4 years are turds in the swimming pool.
1 comment:
reblogged on psylords.info. we'll help you get the word out - thanks for your investigations
Post a Comment